I found it both truthful and inspiring…
Truthful, because the chaotic path of discovery involved in understanding mysterious digital media reflected my own experiences on similar digital preservation adventures, both for the library and for the AQuA and SPRUCE projects.
Inspiring, because it brought new light to my old concerns about format/software/hardware registry systems. I've long been worried that they have not been designed with their users in mind. Specifically, the users that know all of this information and are willing to spend time sharing it. Why would they do it? What incentive would they need? What form of knowledge sharing would they choose?
Upon reading Ben's article, things became clearer. As I twittered at the time:
Now, go through and read it one more time, and think about how such a registry could actually have helped. What would it need to include? [t]
Could it really replace the expertise of those five (or so) people? Or should its purpose be to capture and link what they have achieved? [t]
Is the answer really in building registries? Or is it better to run more XFR STNs and help document and preserve what they do? [t]